Alas, we may never know the legal standard of care for an e-discovery vendor.
A pair of lawsuits that could have made for some great drama and established a vendor standard of care has been settled. I previously blogged about a dispute between Sullivan & Cromwell and EED. Both S&C’s initial suit in NY state and EED’s countersuit in Washington state have been settled according to Sullivan & Cromwell, E-Discovery Vendor Settle Lawsuits (National Law Journal 18 Jan 2008): “The short-lived clash was believed to be the first of its kind between a major law firm and a leading vendor in the growing area of electronic discovery services.”
Fear not – given the volume of EDD, I suspect it’s only a matter of time before we see another such suit.
Archives
Blog Categories
- Alternative Legal Provider (44)
- Artificial Intelligence (AI) (57)
- Bar Regulation (13)
- Best Practices (39)
- Big Data and Data Science (14)
- Blockchain (10)
- Bloomberg Biz of Law Summit – Live (6)
- Business Intelligence (21)
- Contract Management (21)
- Cool Legal Conferences (13)
- COVID-19 (11)
- Design (5)
- Do Less Law (40)
- eDiscovery and Litigation Support (165)
- Experience Management (12)
- Extranets (11)
- General (194)
- Innovation and Change Management (188)
- Interesting Technology (105)
- Knowledge Management (229)
- Law Department Management (20)
- Law Departments / Client Service (120)
- Law Factory v. Bet the Farm (30)
- Law Firm Service Delivery (128)
- Law Firm Staffing (27)
- Law Libraries (6)
- Legal market survey featured (6)
- Legal Process Improvement (27)
- Legal Project Management (26)
- Legal Secretaries – Their Future (17)
- Legal Tech Start-Ups (18)
- Litigation Finance (5)
- Low Cost Law Firm Centers (22)
- Management and Technology (179)
- Notices re this Blog (10)
- Online Legal Services (64)
- Outsourcing (141)
- Personal Productivity (40)
- Roundup (58)
- Structure of Legal Business (2)
- Supplier News (13)
- Visual Intelligence (14)