I am at a large law firm knowledge management conference. The morning session was Does Enterprise 2.0 = 2 Knowledge Management 2.0 and featured Dan Keldsen, Director of Market Intelligence and Carl Frappaolo, VP Market Intelligence, both associated with AIIM. This was one of the more interesting KM sessions I’ve attended in a while.
Here are highlights of the session:
Interesting group exercise to define themes [conference organizers take note – this is a great approach]
i. Split into 2 groups
ii. Write terms on Post-It Notes – keep to 1 or 2 words – to describe E2.0 and KM2.0
iii. Put all the Post-It Notes on a wall
iv. Each group de-duplicates Post-It Notes and organizes by theme
Enterprise 2.0 Themes
i. Collaboration
ii. Social networking
iii. Knowledge sharing
iv. Search
v. Virtual organization
KM 2.0 Themes
i. Training and PD
ii. Forms and precedents
iii. People and processes
iv. Taxonomy, content organization
v. Sharing, gathering, and re-using
Comments on excercise
i. Paper exercise illustrates the wiki approach of group authorship
ii. Exercise shows that tools do not help reconcile differences of views in groups
Commonalities across the KM and Enterprise 2.0
i. Search, collaboration
ii. People
iii. Technology
iv. Sharing information
What’s new if we accept premise that the basic tenets of KM don’t change because of Enterprise 2.0?
Four elements of KM, irrespective tools and jargon
i. Business strategy and purpose
ii. Process
iii. Technology
iv. People (allegiances, incentives, inclinations, respect, trust) – this does not go away, irrespective of technology. Open access to technology does not mean everyone has an equal voice.
Legacy technology and KM
i. Intermediation – Groupware, profiling, e-mail [sharing views and info]
ii. Externalization – doc man, visualization, portals [to capture explicit know-how]
iii. Internalization – search, taxonomies, agents [to help users find info]
iv. Cognition – workflow, decision support [to help drive decision making]
New tech and KM
i. Intermediation – wikis, blogs, social network analysis [sharing views and info]
ii. Externalization – wikis, blogs, podcasting [to capture explicit know-how]
iii. Internalization – RSS, mashup, search, social tagging [to help users find info]
iv. Cognition – RSS mashup [to help drive decision making]
New in technology (From Q1 2008 research available from AIIM).
i. Low barrier and ease of implementation
ii. Web and widely accessible
iii. Lean
iv. Low cost
v. Agile
vi. Emergent and heuristic [drastically reduced delivery time for new applications]
Critical to understand if an organization is ready for a new technology. You cannot use new technology to drive organizational change
Archives
Blog Categories
- Alternative Legal Provider (44)
- Artificial Intelligence (AI) (57)
- Bar Regulation (13)
- Best Practices (39)
- Big Data and Data Science (14)
- Blockchain (10)
- Bloomberg Biz of Law Summit – Live (6)
- Business Intelligence (21)
- Contract Management (21)
- Cool Legal Conferences (13)
- COVID-19 (11)
- Design (5)
- Do Less Law (40)
- eDiscovery and Litigation Support (165)
- Experience Management (12)
- Extranets (11)
- General (194)
- Innovation and Change Management (188)
- Interesting Technology (105)
- Knowledge Management (229)
- Law Department Management (20)
- Law Departments / Client Service (120)
- Law Factory v. Bet the Farm (30)
- Law Firm Service Delivery (128)
- Law Firm Staffing (27)
- Law Libraries (6)
- Legal market survey featured (6)
- Legal Process Improvement (27)
- Legal Project Management (26)
- Legal Secretaries – Their Future (17)
- Legal Tech Start-Ups (18)
- Litigation Finance (5)
- Low Cost Law Firm Centers (22)
- Management and Technology (179)
- Notices re this Blog (10)
- Online Legal Services (64)
- Outsourcing (141)
- Personal Productivity (40)
- Roundup (58)
- Structure of Legal Business (2)
- Supplier News (13)
- Visual Intelligence (14)